ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. Methods Clinical data of 97 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice were collected and analyzed retrospectively, includs 54 patients in ERCP group and 43 patients in PTCD group. The clinical curative effect, postoperative complications, comfort score and hospitalization time and costs were compared between the two groups. Results The symptoms improved compared with preoperative. The total remission rate of jaundice in ERCP group and PTCD group was 77.78％ vs 79.07％, and the remission rate of high obstructive jaundice was 55.00％, vs 89.29％, and the remission rate of low obstruction jaundice was 91.18％, vs 60.00％.There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group and PTCD group was 37.04％ vs 16.28％. There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); The comfort scale of ERCP group and PTCD group was (15.13 ± 3.89) points vs (16.60 ± 3.15) points. There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); The hospitalization time of ERCP group and PTCD group were (8.74 ± 4.94) days vs (11.12 ± 4.82) days, and the hospitalization costs were (22.70 ± 6.30) thousand yuan vs (21.90 ± 3.40) thousand yuan. Conclusion Satisfactory clinical curative effect for patients with malignant obstructive jaundice can be derived from both ERCP and PTCD. The treatment of ERCP has more advantages than PTCD in patients with low obstruction, while PTCD is better than ERCP in patients with high obstruction. But ERCP group is better than PTCD in comfort score and shorter in hospitalization time. There is no obvious difference on hospitalization costs.